Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, getting an 82.5 score against 71.5. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, providing the user a lot of extra features. LG V30S ThinQ is a noticeably lighter and thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
LG V30S ThinQ features a little better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 has an incredibly better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a way worse amount of pixels in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger display.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a better memory capacity for apps and games than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ features a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way worse 16 MP resolution camera.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.