Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The LG V50 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than OSCAL Tiger 12, but it is just a bit lighter.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower count of pixels in each inch of screen and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
LG V50 ThinQ has a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera with lot less megapixels. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.