Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a global score of 80.3 against 71.5. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A12 has 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy A12's body is a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a higher display density and a bit larger screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has more internal storage.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 and the Galaxy A12 count with very similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A12 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The OSCAL Tiger 12 and the Galaxy A12 feature incredibly similar battery performance. Samsung Galaxy A12 takes better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with a much lower 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.