Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's general score of 71.5. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while OSCAL Tiger 12 works with Android 13 OS. Even being the best we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A32's design is just a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a larger amount of RAM. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a higher pixel density, a lot higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy A32 has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with way less MP. OSCAL Tiger 12 has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has more internal memory.
The Galaxy A32 has a battery duration that is very similar to OSCAL Tiger 12's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.