Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 has a score of 82.3, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 score. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy A60 has the previous 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Galaxy A60 is a somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 2 GB more RAM. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A60 captures much clearer photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 47% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.