Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a general score of 84.2 against 71.5. The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a somewhat lighter and a little thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a CPU that is just as good as the processing unit in OSCAL Tiger 12, and although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a quite larger screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) takes much better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.