Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a 90.5 score against 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a a bit heavier device than OSCAL Tiger 12, but both of them are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, while OSCAL Tiger 12 comes with Android 13 operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.