Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and Blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 82.4 score against 71.5. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M30 has newer 9.0 Pie version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it counts with a lot of extra features and performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy M30 construction has the same thickness than OSCAL Tiger 12, but it's lighter.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy M30 shoots a bit better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy M30 has a battery life that's very similar to OSCAL Tiger 12's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.