Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a overall score of 83.3 against 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy M30s construction is a little thicker but a little lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M30s has older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a quite bigger display. Galaxy M30s's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in OSCAL Tiger 12, and although the Galaxy M30s has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with longer battery duration than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a 20% bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy M30s shoots way better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.