Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy M51 has older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Galaxy M51 is a thicker and just a little heavier phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
The Galaxy M51 features a processing unit that's just as good as the OSCAL Tiger 12 one, and although the Galaxy M51 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because it has a just a bit higher screen density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a little bigger screen.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy M51 takes way better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have a same resolution camera.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.