Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is a lot thicker and a lot heavier than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful processor than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much lower pixel density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a way bigger display.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a back camera with way more mega-pixels. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.