Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a 77.8 score against 71.5. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is a lot thinner but just a little bit heavier than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it provides you lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little bit better looking screen than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per screen inch, a lot worse 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more brightness. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit longer battery lifetime than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.