Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 35.00mm focal length |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a global score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has the previous 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a a little lighter and just a bit thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much more vibrant screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, a quite higher screen pixels density and a bit bigger display. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has just a bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have a 8 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better memory for applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have a 64 MP resolution back camera.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit superior battery life than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.