Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| -- | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Q8 is a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a general score of 77.2 against 73.4. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG Q8 has the newer 7.0 Nougat version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. The LG Q8 design is a lot lighter and a little bit thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
The LG Q8 features a lot better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater screen density and a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a little better hardware performance than LG Q8, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
LG Q8 features a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lot lower 16 MP resolution back facing camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a superior memory to install games and applications than LG Q8, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 2 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG Q8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.