Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black and Blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a global score of 82.4 against 73.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy M30 design is lighter and just a bit thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
Samsung Galaxy M30 has a much better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and much more pixels per inch in the screen. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has more RAM.
Galaxy M30 counts with just a bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a way less mega pixels camera in the back. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M30, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy M30's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery life in OSCAL Tiger 13.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.