Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Pantech | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.68 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Adreno 330 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 703 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is way better than Pantech Vega Iron 2's overall score of 62.6. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Pantech Vega Iron 2 has Android 4.4.2 version. Although it's the best in this review, LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little bit thicker and heavier device than Pantech Vega Iron 2.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better display than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because it has a larger display, a better display pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Pantech Vega Iron 2, although it has a lesser megapixels camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 48 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ has superior battery performance than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the Pantech Vega Iron 2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.