Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.61 x 3.46 x 0.44 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 184 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT8312 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 750 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is way better than the Plum Coach Plus's 49.5 global score. The Google Pixel 2 body is incredibly thinner and lighter than the Plum Coach Plus. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a much better display than Plum Coach Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a much better number of pixels per inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 2 has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Plum Coach Plus, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 124 GB more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 2 features a better performance than Plum Coach Plus, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel 2 features just a little bit longer battery life than Plum Coach Plus, because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh. Google Pixel 2 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Plum Coach Plus, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 2 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.