Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.19 x 2.76 x 0.85 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 900 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a lot better than Plum Gator's overall score of 49.1. Google Pixel 2 is a notably thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than Plum Gator. Google Pixel 2 has a better performance than Plum Gator, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Google Pixel 2 features a little bit better looking display than Plum Gator, because it has a much higher screen density, a much larger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 1920px. The Google Pixel 2 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Plum Gator, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Plum Gator, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 124 GB more internal storage. Plum Gator has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 2 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.