Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | LG |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.65 x 2.46 x 0.45 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink, Red and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 2 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.22 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 650 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than the Plum Trigger Plus, with a general score of 83.7 against 46.2. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Plum Trigger Plus has Android 4.2.2 version. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is notably heavier but way thinner than Plum Trigger Plus.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better screen than Plum Trigger Plus, because it has a way bigger display, a much higher pixels density and a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a quite better processing power than Plum Trigger Plus, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better camera than Plum Trigger Plus, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a way better resolution camera in the back. LG V50 ThinQ features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Plum Trigger Plus, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a really longer battery duration than Plum Trigger Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Plum Trigger Plus.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.