Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | LG |
| Android 4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.52 x 2.38 x 0.48 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1350mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a lot better than the Plum Trigger Pro's 48 score. The LG V50 ThinQ body is extremely heavier but a lot thinner than Plum Trigger Pro. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Plum Trigger Pro has Android 4.2, counting with a couple nice extra features.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a greater hardware performance than Plum Trigger Pro, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better looking display than Plum Trigger Pro, because it has a way better screen pixels density, a way bigger screen and a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more storage for applications and games than Plum Trigger Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery duration than Plum Trigger Pro, because it has a 196 percent more battery size.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior camera than Plum Trigger Pro, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with lot more MP.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.