Compare phones
Plum Velocity II
X260ZTE Warp
N860| Global Score | |
| 43 | 45.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | ZTE |
| Android 4.0 | Android 2.3.5 |
| -- | 2011-10-20 |
| 4.35 x 2.54 x 0.49 inches | 5.10 x 2.70 x 0.45 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 4.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 85.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 320 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 222 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6575M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Single-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.47 | 7.38 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 2.5 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 5.61 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 3.5 | 2.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 270 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time |
| 2.88 | 3.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Warp is slightly better than the Plum Velocity II, having a score of 45.6 against 43. ZTE Warp's body is extremely lighter and a little thinner than the Plum Velocity II. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the ZTE Warp has 2.3.5 version while Plum Velocity II has Android 4.0 version.
The Plum Velocity II features a little bit better performance than ZTE Warp, and although they both have the same number of cores and 512 MB of RAM, the Plum Velocity II also has an extra GPU. Plum Velocity II has just a bit better looking screen than ZTE Warp, because although it has a really smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 320 x 480px, it also counts with a quite greater display density.
Plum Velocity II counts with a little bit better camera than ZTE Warp, although it has a lot lower 3 megapixels resolution camera in the back. The ZTE Warp has just a bit more memory for applications and games than Plum Velocity II, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 3,49 GB more internal memory.
The ZTE Warp has improved battery lifetime than Plum Velocity II, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the ZTE Warp is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.