Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Arctic white and Glacier blue | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a score of 78.3, which is just a bit better than the realme X3 SuperZoom's 72.6 overall score. Vivo X70 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and a little lighter than the realme X3 SuperZoom. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X70 Pro has newer 11 version while realme X3 SuperZoom has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with just a bit better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit better display pixel density. The vivo X70 Pro has a much greater storage to install games and applications than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo X70 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than realme X3 SuperZoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes a bit better photos and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the realme X3 SuperZoom also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Vivo X70 Pro has a little better battery life than realme X3 SuperZoom, because it has a 4450mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.