Search


Compare phones

Global Score
35.939.3
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--Symbian 9.3
2007-10-012009-02-16
3.54 x 1.80 x 0.70 inches4.40 x 1.97 x 0.57 inches
2.72 ounces4.90 ounces
$ 1599.00$ 360.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
137 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.66.4
processorARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor
GPU GPU
5.766.21
Storage
28,67 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.30
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.516.38
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.33.3
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
360 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
280 hours standby time
5.3 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

Nokia E75 is slightly better than the Samsung Beat, with a 39.3 score against 35.9. Even though Nokia E75 is extremely heavier than the Samsung Beat, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Nokia E75 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Beat, because it has 1 more cpu cores. Nokia E75 has a much better looking display than Samsung Beat, because it has a just a little greater pixels number in each inch in the display and a much higher 320 x 240 resolution.

Nokia E75 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Beat, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Samsung Beat has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia E75, although it has no slot for an external memory card.

The Nokia E75 features greater battery performance than Samsung Beat, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.

Nokia E75 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.