Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.332.6
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
2009-02-062012-05-15
4.14 x 1.74 x 0.58 inches4.35 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches
2.34 ounces3.02 ounces
$ 205.00$ 99.00
Display / Screen
1.5 inches1.8 inches
128 x 128 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
CSTNLCD
121 pixels per inch114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.45.3
processor processor
--16 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
--10,24 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.52
Camera
--0.30 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
04.4
GSMEDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM, Dual SIM
0.10.4
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Polymer Battery1400mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
839 hours standby time
14 hours talk time
2.243.12
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Nokia 112 is a little bit better than Samsung E1125, having a global score of 32.6 against 30.3. Nokia 112's body is way newer than the Samsung E1125's, although it is heavier and just a little bit thicker. Samsung E1125 has a little bit better display than Nokia 112, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 128 x 128px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher screen density.

The Nokia 112 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung E1125, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 32 GB. Samsung E1125 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Nokia 112. Both of them have a 0-Core processor.

The Nokia 112 counts with a way better camera than Samsung E1125. The Nokia 112 has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung E1125, because it has a 75 percent larger battery capacity.

The Nokia 112 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.