Compare phones
Samsung E1125
GT-E1125| Global Score | |
| 30.3 | 33.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| 2009-02-06 | 2006-11-28 |
| 4.14 x 1.74 x 0.58 inches | 4.14 x 1.74 x 0.73 inches |
| 2.34 ounces | 2.96 ounces |
| $ 205.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.5 inches | -- |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| CSTN | STN |
| 121 pixels per inch | 137 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 5.7 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 5,12 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 2.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 970mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 6086 is a little bit better than Samsung E1125, having a 33.3 score against 30.3. Despite being the best in this comparison, we must note that it is also noticeably older, noticeably thicker and heavier. Nokia 6086 counts with a little bit better display than Samsung E1125, because it has a slightly better 160 x 128 resolution and a just a bit greater display density.
Nokia 6086 features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung E1125. Nokia 6086's CPU is very similar to the CPU in Samsung E1125, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 6086 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung E1125, because it has a 970mAh battery capacity. Nokia 6086 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung E1125.
Nokia 6086 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.