Compare phones
Samsung E1125
GT-E1125| Global Score | |
| 30.3 | 32.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| 2009-02-06 | 2007-01-07 |
| 4.14 x 1.74 x 0.58 inches | 3.90 x 1.70 x 0.70 inches |
| 2.34 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 205.00 | $ 140.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.5 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| CSTN | STN |
| 121 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 27,65 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | Memory Stick Micro (M2) external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.3 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 780mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 360 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.24 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Ericsson W200 is a bit better than Samsung E1125, getting a global score of 32.6 against 30.3. Even being the best we compare here, we must highlight that it's also a noticeably older, thicker and way heavier device. The Samsung E1125 counts with just a bit better screen than Sony Ericsson W200, because although it has a little bit worse 128 x 128 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display density.
The Sony Ericsson W200 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung E1125. Sony Ericsson W200's processing unit is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung E1125, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit. The Sony Ericsson W200 has a very superior camera than Samsung E1125.
Samsung E1125 and Sony Ericsson W200 both feature extremely similar batteries duration, although the Sony Ericsson W200 has a 3 percent smaller battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Sony Ericsson W200 is also by far the cheapest one, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.