Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 2.3, 2.2, 2.1 | Android 10 |
| 2010-06-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.90 x 2.54 x 0.56 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is way better than the Samsung Epic 4G's 53.9 general score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version and Samsung Epic 4G has Android 2.3 version. LG V40 ThinQ's design is noticeably newer and incredibly thinner than Samsung Epic 4G's, although it is just a little bit heavier.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a better looking screen than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has a really larger display, a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V40 ThinQ features a much better performing processor than Samsung Epic 4G, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
LG V40 ThinQ shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way higher resolution back-facing camera. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Epic 4G, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the Samsung Epic 4G, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.