Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way better than Samsung Galaxy A01, having an 87.1 score against 71.6. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way newer than Samsung Galaxy A01, it is notably heavier and just a bit thicker. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version, so it gives you some additional features and a performance increase.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a greater pixels number per screen inch, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A01, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A01 features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor capturing way higher quality pictures.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a really longer battery life than Galaxy A01, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.