Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 100.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A01's global score of 71.6. Despite being the best phone we compare here, we must tell that it's also a little bit thicker and heavier. The Motorola One Action counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A01, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels, a quite bigger screen and more pixels per screen inch.
Motorola One Action has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Action counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Action also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola One Action features a bit better camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations. The Motorola One Action has a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A01, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A01. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A01, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.