Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is better than the Galaxy A01, with a score of 80 against 71.6. Even being the best device in this review, the Motorola One Zoom is a heavier and a little bit thicker device than Galaxy A01. Motorola One Zoom features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display, a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little larger display.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A01, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 384 GB smaller, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory. The Motorola One Zoom has a little better processing power than Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola One Zoom also has more RAM.
Motorola One Zoom counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A01, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Motorola One Zoom shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A01, because it has a way larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments, a lot more MP back facing camera, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A01. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One Zoom, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A01, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.