Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is way better than the Galaxy A01's 71.6 global score. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Although the Motorola razr (2020) and Galaxy A01 were released only 9 months apart, the Motorola razr (2020) body is extremely heavier but also a little thinner than Galaxy A01.
The Motorola razr (2020) features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a better screen density, a little bit bigger display and a better 876 x 2142 resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A01, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola razr (2020) features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a way bigger camera sensor, a much bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A01 has a bit better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A01, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.