Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A01, with a 76.2 score against 71.6. The nubia Red Magic 5S body is somewhat thicker and much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A01. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but nubia Red Magic 5S has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a sharper display than Galaxy A01, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a bigger screen and a higher pixel density.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A01, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a way better battery life than Galaxy A01, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A01, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot larger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality, a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A01. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A01, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.