Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A01's 71.6 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11, so it provides you a couple additional features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold and Samsung Galaxy A01 were only released with a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is a lot heavier but somewhat thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger display, a little bit greater pixel quantity per screen inch and a way better 1536 x 2152 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Fold features just a little better performance than Galaxy A01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy Fold takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition, a much bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light situations and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy Fold has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A01, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.