Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-04-05 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a global score of 79, which is better than the Galaxy A01's 71.6 global score. These phones use Android OS, but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A01 has Android 11, counting with a couple additional features. Even being the best we are comparing here, the Xperia XZ2 Compact is an older, somewhat heavier and extremely thicker phone than Galaxy A01.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A01, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixel density and a lot better 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A01, because it has a much bigger camera sensor, a way higher resolution camera in the back, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video. The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A01, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 112 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A01 features a bit longer battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.