Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has an overall score of 81.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A01's overall score of 71.6. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also somewhat thicker and much heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has more RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a brighter display than Galaxy A01, because it has a larger screen, a higher screen pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a way higher (4K) video resolution and a much larger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 72 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.