Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A01's global score of 71.6. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also much heavier and a little thicker. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger screen, more pixels per inch in the screen and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a way better camera than Galaxy A01, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera, a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture and a way better (4K) video resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 64 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy A01, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A01, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.