Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2021-01-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than Galaxy A02s, having a global score of 85.3 against 74.5. The iPhone 11 Pro Max body is somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A02s, although it is somewhat heavier and was released around 16 months before. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A02s comes with Android 11 operating system.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a better performing processor than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM and a 64 bits processor. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have a same size display, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a lot better resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a way higher display pixels density.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a much better camera than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments and a much higher (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A02s counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A02s has superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3969mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A02s. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy A02s, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.