Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has a score of 79.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A02s's overall score of 74.5. Despite of the fact that the LG V30 is incredibly older than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, it's construction is thinner and lighter. LG V30 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V30 has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way higher pixels density. The LG V30 takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy A02s, because it has a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a way better video quality and a back camera with a better 16 MP resolution.
LG V30 has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A02s, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A02s counts with a much better battery life than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A02s. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V30, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A02s, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.