Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A02s, getting a 77.9 score against 74.5. Although Motorola DROID Turbo is way older and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version while Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11 version, providing the user some nice extra features and improved performance.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a larger camera aperture, a camera with way more MP and a much higher video definition. The Galaxy A02s has much more storage to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A02s has improved battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28 percent larger battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.