Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A02s, having an 80.7 score against 74.5. The Motorola One Vision construction is just a little thinner and just a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. The Motorola One Vision has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display density and a way higher 1080 x 2520 resolution.
Motorola One Vision features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A02s, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Vision has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Vision also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A02s features a really longer battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A02s, because it has a lot bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.