Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is much better than the Galaxy A02s's 74.5 global score. The Galaxy A50 is an older device than Galaxy A02s, but Samsung could make it lighter and thinner. The Galaxy A50 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A50 also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A50 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy A50 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A02s has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A50 takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a much bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with much more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.