Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A02s's 74.5 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11. Galaxy Note 5 is an extremely older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A02s, but it is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
Galaxy A02s has a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater pixels density and a much higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments, a camera with a better resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Galaxy A02s counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A02s features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A02s. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note 5, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A02s, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.