Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A02s, getting a 95.4 score against 74.5. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is newer and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A02s's, although it's heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11, so it provides you some extra features.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A02s, because it has much more pixels per display inch, a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A02s counts with a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations, a way more mega pixels camera and a much higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A02s one.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A02s. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A02s, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.