Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A10's general score of 72.3. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version while Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11. Even being the best cellphone in this review, Motorola DROID Turbo's design is older, just a little heavier and extremely thicker than Samsung Galaxy A10.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A10, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a graphics processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display density and a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way more mega pixels back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A10 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a little longer battery life than Galaxy A10, because it has a 15% larger battery size.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.