Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A10s's 73.8 score. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, we must note that it's also somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A10s, because it has a way higher pixel count per inch of screen, a little bit larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy A10s counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A10s counts with a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A10s. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A10s, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.