Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A10s's score of 73.8. The HTC One M9 body is just a bit lighter than the Galaxy A10s, but it's thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version.
HTC One M9 features an incredibly better display than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much better screen density. The Galaxy A10s counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A10s also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
HTC One M9 counts with a better processor than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also has a larger amount of RAM memory, a 64-bit processing unit and an extra graphics processor. HTC One M9 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a much more MP back camera.
The Galaxy A10s features a way better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
HTC One M9 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy A10s.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.