Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy A10s, with a overall score of 80.9 against 73.8. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra construction is newer than the Galaxy A10s's, although it's a little thicker and heavier. These phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 12 version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a higher pixel count per inch of display and a quite bigger screen. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A10s has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.