Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a score of 81.9, which is much better than Galaxy A10s's global score of 73.8. These phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version while Galaxy A10s has Android 11. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is extremely newer, but just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than the Galaxy A10s.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A10s, because it has a bit larger screen, a much higher display density and a way higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px. The Samsung Galaxy A10s has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a greater camera than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way better video quality and a back camera with much more megapixels. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.