Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Galaxy A10s's overall score of 73.8. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is newer, but heavier and a little thicker than Galaxy A10s.
The Samsung Galaxy A10s counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a way better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better images in low light situations. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A10s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.