Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a global score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A10s's 73.8 score. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Moto Z3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11. Moto Z3 is an older phone than Galaxy A10s, but it is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
Moto Z3 features a bit better performance than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto Z3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z3 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a greater pixels density.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A10s, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A10s features better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back camera and a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Although Motorola Moto Z3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z3, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A10s, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.